Tue 20 February 2018

Visionary in a banana republic: A political review of Heneral Luna

[supsystic-social-sharing id="1"]

Philippine history is rife with betrayals, infightings, and sheer mediocrity from elite political leaders but still we celebrate the life of revolutionaries who have fought against superior politico-military power from enemies and treachery from supposed comrades. The list of heroes, known or unknown, betrayed by their countrymen is very long. The most prominent ones that come to mind are Andres Bonifacio and Ninoy Aquino–icons immortalized in the pantheon of greatness.

However, General Antonio Luna, a revolutionary yet unknown to many, is not your usual hero. He neither is a romanticized plebian like Bonifacio or a bombastic yet astute politician like Ninoy. He is known in history as the rugged, hot-tempered, arrogant young gun from Tondo with seemingly no redeeming qualities in his demeanor. Yet, he was praised by America as the only general the Philippines had. His military strategy—the Luna Defense—was copied in Sierra Maestra in Cuba and in the hinterlands of Vietnam to topple imperialist United States in their respective lands.

In Jerold Tarrog’s Heneral Luna, the biopic of the general is spot on, albeit partially fictionalized to ease Luna’s complicated life. John Arcilla’s antihero portrayal of Luna is accurate given the general’s propensity to mince no words in the face of mediocrity and cowardice. In the film, Luna is indeed a mad genius whose military expertise was way ahead of time, making him and his ragtag army outshine the American army and the Filipino elite. Despite his unquestionable credentials, the film exposes chinks in Luna’s armor—that his greatest weakness is his very strength, that his superior intellect and unstoppable resolve courted the envy of the wavering principalia class.

Luna was rightfully portrayed in the film as a visionary. He was scientific and strategic in his military approach. He was not just a loudmouth who simply imposed iron discipline by being legalistic about wartime laws. He knew he was surrounded by snakes from everywhere and he had to think of creative means to defeat the colonialists. He wrote journals and poems, trained a special unit of snipers, organized a military school for lieutenants, made tactical advances and retreats, drew maps and formations, deployed medics to aid the wounded, recruited scribes to document the war, and built political mass movements in support of the revolutionary army. His innovations were unprecedented, earning the praise of his men and allies in the cabinet.

Despite monumental heaps of praises for Luna, he simply lived in the wrong society. A banana republic since day one, the Philippines had long been plundered by a selfish, regionalistic elite whose only interest is business. Their followers in the army asserted autonomy contrary to Luna’s highly centralized operations. These undisciplined and uncommitted traitors, who would rather stay in their comfort zones, can never fit Luna’s style. With these hyenas, Luna inevitably did fall into the hands of his countrymen.

Indeed, the Philippines was not ready for a Luna to lead its liberation. Corruption, atomization, and mediocrity are attendant results of a society built without a vision of development. The Philippines’ place as gateway to exploit the vast Asian market made our country mere foot stool for imperialist nations. No wonder why in this day and age, the Philippines cannot stand on its own in the political skirmishes of the United States and China. It is of no surprise that political dynasties, poverty, and red tape are prevalent. Our economy thrives on remittances and rent. The State cannot feed its people for shunning industrial and agricultural development. The State has no social vision as it would rather be co-opted to its creditors for artificial growth instead of developing the economy for social services. Our problems are deeply rooted in history and colonial/elite rule has not done anything to change our lives for the better.

With such undisciplined elite comes a likewise undisciplined mass of people who hustle their way for their daily survival. While our country needs a visionary like Luna, Philippine society in general frowns on brilliant minds because of our stunted culture. We as a people would rather continue our routines instead of daring to build something new and radical. And the daring among us gets killed.

Luna’s fall 116 years ago was not only a personal tragedy, it was a social malaise. It reminds us that we need not rely on a single strongman for our liberation. It is only us who can liberate ourselves.

[supsystic-social-sharing id="2"]
  • Rowie

    Just don’t lump Philippine society into one big mass, that’s simplistic, we are not that at all.

    • Pen

      So what are we?

  • Juanito Divina

    I think this the other side of the coin. During our school days (circa ’60) we’re required to read the book of
    Gregorio Zaide which was the entire contents were dictated by Emilio Aguinaldo ( by that time he was still alive). Emilio Aguinaldo must be question about the death of Bonifacio brothers and the ambushed of Gen. Antonio Luna & his men by Buencamino (Right hand of Aguinaldo) & his group. Gen Antonio Luna was the only Filipino recognized by the Americans as the only Filipino General by that time.

  • Thorrington516

    Care to back up those assertions? “A banana republic since day one, the Philippines had long been plundered
    by a selfish, regionalistic elite whose only interest is business.” – is this the mythic Cavitenism so long blamed for the failure of the revolution, despite the very obvious fact that Aguinaldo had generals and officers from other regions, including ex-Spanish Army soldiers, some of whom were recruited by Luna himself. And what ‘business’ would that be? What proof do you have for your statement?

    As for ‘elite’, perhaps you don’t realize the obvious fact that the Luna brothers WERE MEMBERS OF THE ILUSTRADO ELITE. What the hell is this ‘masa’-fying of Luna that you are engaging in? Antonio and Juan particularly were known to Spanish society, Juan was a renowned SPANISH painter, both were European educated, Antonio studied medicine and military tactics and duelled with Rizal for white girls. All this while your presumably elitista Aguinaldo was, for all intents and purposes, eating green mangos in Imus.

    “Their followers in the army asserted autonomy contrary to Luna’s highly
    centralized operations.” – do you have any idea how the Revolutionary Army was raised and commanded? Did you ever consider that they asserted autonomy because, for all their Spanish style military ranks, they were locally raised warlord-style forces and that forces of this type are very difficult to command in a regular military fashion because their loyalty is to their immediate commander and not to some abstract idea of government, state, army or nation? Their general’s loyalty would have been to Aguinaldo as the symbol of the government but not to an chain of command. Most tribal, warlord and noble armies would be of this type and it does not reflect on the quality or courage of the troops but it would make them hard to impose command authority upon them.

    “These undisciplined and uncommitted traitors,
    who would rather stay in their comfort zones, can never fit Luna’s
    style. With these hyenas, Luna inevitably did fall into the hands of his
    countrymen.” – there are many reasons for Luna not being obeyed from political opposition of the Autonomists, to distrust and hostility to Luna as an elitista who had not joined the first phase of the Revolution – think of it, the Kawit soldiers that we Filipinos have damned for Luna’s murder, were most likely veteran soldiers who had fought and WON the first victories at Imus and Binakayan. Luna by contrast was a hard fighter who NEVER ACTUALLY WON a single battle (albeit fighting at a severe disadvantage against a highly superior foe, the US Military) – to his harsh style of discipline, to the warlord-style organization of the army (which is a more realistic explanation for events like Tomas Mascardo’s refusal to obey Luna at Calumpit, or Gregorio del Pilar’s arrogant threat to General Mamerto Natividad, “Where General del Pilar commands YOU DO NOT COMMAND.”

    Once again… where’s your proof for your assertions?

  • disqus_Mjwdb3qMXI

    Indeed, Luna’s assassination triggered the death of the revolution. Aguinaldo’s failure to march the victors of the first phase of the revolution, to embrace the vision of Luna to defeat the Americans and establish a truly independent country led this country to what it is now. Many, including Aguinaldo, fought the Americans for recognition of their formed government….. a fight and negotiate strategy. While Luna fought the Americans for total independence……. whether the Americans recognize us or not……. nothing less. To Luna, independence will only come from defeating the foreign invaders……. that freedom can only be won by blood and nothing else. …. and can never be by some blood and some signed papers.